We recognized that the example of Christ is one of nonviolence and a willingness to suffer in order to achieve victory. We affirm with Romans chapter 12:14 – 21 that we must never use violence as an act of revenge and that our responsibility is to overcome evil with good.
At the same time we note that Romans 13:4 regards government authority as God's servant to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. This suggests that at times God uses authorities and nations to exercise his judgment.
We recognized the tension in our own lives, knowing that it is possible that we would be called upon to intervene to protect the innocent even as we follow the nonviolent example Jesus. We concluded that violence may never achieve justice, but may be necessary to stop injustice. Ultimately justice must be left in the hands of God, for only he can see clearly and act purely.
It's impossible to find a perfect leaf. On my walk into church one day I attempted to collect as many different leaves as possible. They had fallen from the trees and littered the ground all along my path. Wrinkled and curved and marked by rips and tears it was hard to find good specimens. As I gathered my collection I realized that beauty did not require perfection. The various colours and marks, curves and rips gave each of the leaves an interesting character. As I gathered and pondered I felt that God was saying to me that his love is not reserved for flawless people. His love is an active love that atones for our flaws and values us in our frailty. We are beautiful in God's eyes.
When it comes to the institutions of government and religion, Baptist thinking has always favoured a separation. This protects the freedom of conscience of every individual. Governments should not interfere with religious practices nor should religious practices be publicly enforced upon citizens.
If however we see politics as a process of shared decision-making and religion as a worldview or perspective that each individual has, then politics and religion must mix. One might say that it would be impossible for them to not mix. One approaches their political discussions from their religious (worldview) perspective. In this sense even a humanist or a naturalist would be considered religious for they have a set of values and beliefs that shape their lives.
I am intrigued by you work of Charles Taylor who describes modern secular democracies well and has a vision for how people can come together in a pluralist society. He understands that society cannot be built on one single confession but rather that all perspectives must be respected and our shared society must be based on a multiplicity of motives. No one religion or philosophy can be the only political foundation.
Consider this link which outlines some of Taylor's thinking. https://youtu.be/DKVnLwsl5JI
In fact, because the scientific method is limited to the natural frame of reference, science by definition cannot offer evidence for or against the supernatural. It is possible that our universe is affected by someone or something outside of the universe. If God were to produce a miracle, this would not invalidate the discoveries of science. I like how Eric Metaxas puts it:
"There are many important things beyond the scope of science. Asking why the universe exists or asking what is the meaning of life— or simply loving our children— are beyond that scope, but profoundly worthy activities nonetheless. When did scientists come to play the sour role of sneering at anything beyond the sphere of their chosen field?"*
* Metaxas, Eric. Miracles: What They Are, Why They Happen, and How They Can Change Your Life (p. 30).
In a culture of sound bites and arguments, we are seeking to create an environment of meaningful and respectful dialogue. We invite people of diverse perspectives to gather around tables to discuss important topics. Everyone is invited to listen and participate. While we may present short video clips and questions, the emphasis will be on conversation. Come meet new people and join the discussion.
What is Freedom? / Is there free will? Thursday Jan 27, 7pm
Because the book of Acts is written in narrative form we have to look for insights based on the examples given to us. When it comes to the filling of the Holy Spirit, I have found Acts 4: 29 – 31 to be helpful. In these verses we see that the disciples are praying for boldness in the face of opposition and we are told in verse 31 that " they were filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly." First of all this shows us that courage may be evidence of the Holy Spirit working in our lives. The spirit moves in a variety of ways. Graham Cole, in examining this passage, also offers a helpful insight in showing us how to be filled with the Spirit. He suggests that the Spirit fills us when we are asking God to empower our witness. He writes,
When they made the object of their prayer the godly need in that hour (parrsia, boldness), then the fullness came. 149 If I want to be filled with the fullness of the Spirit, then let me set my heart on doing the will of God and call upon him for the enablement to do so...
Cole, Graham A. He Who Gives Life: The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit (Foundations of Evangelical Theology) (Kindle Locations 6146-6149).